Painting = Silent Weapon - Winsor & Newton - Vintage Advertising Campaingns - ART AS SUBSTITUTE OF GOD !!!!!
http://www.winsornewton.com/news/new-products/vintage-advertising-campaigns?lang=gb&utm_campaign=1107369105&utm_content=1032235084235&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Emailvision
I found this article about vintage Winsor&Newton's Campaign. It is so appropriated, I really liked. I have used Winsor & Newton paint since 1999 and since 2000 exclusively this brand as I really care about posterity of the works and quality when painting. It made me glad to find this poster. It is from the Second War ..... what makes sense.....But makes me ask for how many generations have we been taught to believe that art can be used as weapon......Isn't this too common sense ? And for how long, centuries or decades have we believed that art can make real difference? Wasn't like that at the beginning of the civilization and Art History. Who has/had the interest to teach this and keep it alive? Why? And why people believe that it is true? I learned this when was at the Kinder Garden already? Was I victim of brain wash? With what interest it was done to me? When it started? And if it is all wrong? Why did the society started to substitute the idea that God, Moral and spirituality wasn't the solution for Freedom or the Truth anymore but art and the men's invention was ? People that puts its faith on art isn't different that people that puts its faith on science or money. For how many years will I fight to clean the masonry and illuminati's influence on the society for the last 4 centuries from my life, body, mind and soul ? I WANT TO GET RID OF THIS WORLD.
Posted by Caio Fern at 9:28 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
Labels: art History, Deus, moral
6 comments:
Caio Fern said...
paint this up... Linda !!!!
March 23, 2011 9:50 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hey Caio,I've always felt people who are afraid of art are people who have a lie to tell and think an artist might portray the truth.I am not saying art hasn't been used as propaganda, but currently we are facing massive cut to the National Endowments for the Arts and Public Broadcasting, and certain political wanna-bes and pundits are *demonizing* the arts as a whole, and anything art related.Well, maybe it's because we don't bow to their political, divisive whims. Maybe we have a little more intelligence~~maybe want an opposing viewpoint to be able to conscientiously consider before forming an opinion.I have no answers other than the times I am living in are unkind to artists wanting to portray the truth of what is going on. Never thought I would see the day either...XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:05 AM
Caio Fern said...
Hello Anne !!! i was only asking why we were taught to worthship art in general. i think it is a little bit deeper than politics. It is about spirituality.
March 23, 2011 10:12 AM
Caio Fern said...
other thing.... is another , totaly diferent subject to me ... but here in Brazil government uses art for alienating the poor population.
March 23, 2011 10:14 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hmmm....that is sad and interesting that they do that with art. The business of art being only for the wealthy.I don't know why it is not an accessible item to everyone. There have been too many strings attached to the whole thing.People need to just make art. And I agree--I think there is a particular spirituality to it, at least when I work. (an aside, my minister is having me speak to a confirmation class about Spirituality in Work....ought to be interesting...)I wish there were no politics involved in it at all.That's a dream! ;-)XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:20 AM
Caio Fern said...
that is a dream...but for the last thousands of years art and politic = power... were always closed related. 99,9% of the masterpieces wouldn't exist if the royal familys and richer familys weren't behind suporting it production. So we must to learn to deal with it and be ble to put our particular view of world, human being and feeling despite all the money and power involved. even so all this only started, again, not for political issues... i was only asking why and how all the modern civilization substituted it real spiritual values for aesthetical values . http://www.winsornewton.com/news/new-products/vintage-advertising-campaigns?lang=gb&utm_campaign=1107369105&utm_content=1032235084235&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Emailvision
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
Labels: art History, Deus, moral
6 comments:
Caio Fern said...
paint this up... Linda !!!!
March 23, 2011 9:50 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hey Caio,I've always felt people who are afraid of art are people who have a lie to tell and think an artist might portray the truth.I am not saying art hasn't been used as propaganda, but currently we are facing massive cut to the National Endowments for the Arts and Public Broadcasting, and certain political wanna-bes and pundits are *demonizing* the arts as a whole, and anything art related.Well, maybe it's because we don't bow to their political, divisive whims. Maybe we have a little more intelligence~~maybe want an opposing viewpoint to be able to conscientiously consider before forming an opinion.I have no answers other than the times I am living in are unkind to artists wanting to portray the truth of what is going on. Never thought I would see the day either...XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:05 AM
Caio Fern said...
Hello Anne !!! i was only asking why we were taught to worthship art in general. i think it is a little bit deeper than politics. It is about spirituality.
March 23, 2011 10:12 AM
Caio Fern said...
other thing.... is another , totaly diferent subject to me ... but here in Brazil government uses art for alienating the poor population.
March 23, 2011 10:14 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hmmm....that is sad and interesting that they do that with art. The business of art being only for the wealthy.I don't know why it is not an accessible item to everyone. There have been too many strings attached to the whole thing.People need to just make art. And I agree--I think there is a particular spirituality to it, at least when I work. (an aside, my minister is having me speak to a confirmation class about Spirituality in Work....ought to be interesting...)I wish there were no politics involved in it at all.That's a dream! ;-)XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:20 AM
Caio Fern said...
that is a dream...but for the last thousands of years art and politic = power... were always closed related. 99,9% of the masterpieces wouldn't exist if the royal familys and richer familys weren't behind suporting it production. So we must to learn to deal with it and be ble to put our particular view of world, human being and feeling despite all the money and power involved. even so all this only started, again, not for political issues... i was only asking why and how all the modern civilization substituted it real spiritual values for aesthetical values . http://www.winsornewton.com/news/new-products/vintage-advertising-campaigns?lang=gb&utm_campaign=1107369105&utm_content=1032235084235&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Emailvision
I found this article about vintage Winsor&Newton's Campaign. It is so appropriated, I really liked. I have used Winsor & Newton paint since 1999 and since 2000 exclusively this brand as I really care about posterity of the works and quality when painting. It made me glad to find this poster. It is from the Second War ..... what makes sense.....But makes me ask for how many generations have we been taught to believe that art can be used as weapon......Isn't this too common sense ? And for how long, centuries or decades have we believed that art can make real difference? Wasn't like that at the beginning of the civilization and Art History. Who has/had the interest to teach this and keep it alive? Why? And why people believe that it is true? I learned this when was at the Kinder Garden already? Was I victim of brain wash? With what interest it was done to me? When it started? And if it is all wrong? Why did the society started to substitute the idea that God, Moral and spirituality wasn't the solution for Freedom or the Truth anymore but art and the men's invention was ? People that puts its faith on art isn't different that people that puts its faith on science or money. For how many years will I fight to clean the masonry and illuminati's influence on the society for the last 4 centuries from my life, body, mind and soul ? I WANT TO GET RID OF THIS WORLD.
Posted by Caio Fern at 9:28 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
Labels: art History, Deus, moral
6 comments:
Caio Fern said...
paint this up... Linda !!!!
March 23, 2011 9:50 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hey Caio,I've always felt people who are afraid of art are people who have a lie to tell and think an artist might portray the truth.I am not saying art hasn't been used as propaganda, but currently we are facing massive cut to the National Endowments for the Arts and Public Broadcasting, and certain political wanna-bes and pundits are *demonizing* the arts as a whole, and anything art related.Well, maybe it's because we don't bow to their political, divisive whims. Maybe we have a little more intelligence~~maybe want an opposing viewpoint to be able to conscientiously consider before forming an opinion.I have no answers other than the times I am living in are unkind to artists wanting to portray the truth of what is going on. Never thought I would see the day either...XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:05 AM
Caio Fern said...
Hello Anne !!! i was only asking why we were taught to worthship art in general. i think it is a little bit deeper than politics. It is about spirituality.
March 23, 2011 10:12 AM
Caio Fern said...
other thing.... is another , totaly diferent subject to me ... but here in Brazil government uses art for alienating the poor population.
March 23, 2011 10:14 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hmmm....that is sad and interesting that they do that with art. The business of art being only for the wealthy.I don't know why it is not an accessible item to everyone. There have been too many strings attached to the whole thing.People need to just make art. And I agree--I think there is a particular spirituality to it, at least when I work. (an aside, my minister is having me speak to a confirmation class about Spirituality in Work....ought to be interesting...)I wish there were no politics involved in it at all.That's a dream! ;-)XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:20 AM
Caio Fern said...
that is a dream...but for the last thousands of years art and politic = power... were always closed related. 99,9% of the masterpieces wouldn't exist if the royal familys and richer familys weren't behind suporting it production. So we must to learn to deal with it and be ble to put our particular view of world, human being and feeling despite all the money and power involved. even so all this only started, again, not for political issues... i was only asking why and how all the modern civilization substituted it real spiritual values for aesthetical values .
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
Labels: art History, Deus, moral
6 comments:
Caio Fern said...
paint this up... Linda !!!!
March 23, 2011 9:50 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hey Caio,I've always felt people who are afraid of art are people who have a lie to tell and think an artist might portray the truth.I am not saying art hasn't been used as propaganda, but currently we are facing massive cut to the National Endowments for the Arts and Public Broadcasting, and certain political wanna-bes and pundits are *demonizing* the arts as a whole, and anything art related.Well, maybe it's because we don't bow to their political, divisive whims. Maybe we have a little more intelligence~~maybe want an opposing viewpoint to be able to conscientiously consider before forming an opinion.I have no answers other than the times I am living in are unkind to artists wanting to portray the truth of what is going on. Never thought I would see the day either...XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:05 AM
Caio Fern said...
Hello Anne !!! i was only asking why we were taught to worthship art in general. i think it is a little bit deeper than politics. It is about spirituality.
March 23, 2011 10:12 AM
Caio Fern said...
other thing.... is another , totaly diferent subject to me ... but here in Brazil government uses art for alienating the poor population.
March 23, 2011 10:14 AM
Anne Huskey-Lockard said...
Hmmm....that is sad and interesting that they do that with art. The business of art being only for the wealthy.I don't know why it is not an accessible item to everyone. There have been too many strings attached to the whole thing.People need to just make art. And I agree--I think there is a particular spirituality to it, at least when I work. (an aside, my minister is having me speak to a confirmation class about Spirituality in Work....ought to be interesting...)I wish there were no politics involved in it at all.That's a dream! ;-)XXOO~~♥Anne
March 23, 2011 10:20 AM
Caio Fern said...
that is a dream...but for the last thousands of years art and politic = power... were always closed related. 99,9% of the masterpieces wouldn't exist if the royal familys and richer familys weren't behind suporting it production. So we must to learn to deal with it and be ble to put our particular view of world, human being and feeling despite all the money and power involved. even so all this only started, again, not for political issues... i was only asking why and how all the modern civilization substituted it real spiritual values for aesthetical values .
